RoofViews

Building Science

Key Strengths of Four Green Building Rating Systems

By Benjamin Meyer

November 19, 2020

Foggy city

Designing for Moisture Durability and Energy Efficiency, Part 2

Part 1 of our discussion of Designing for Moisture Durability and Energy Efficiency explored the driving forces that result in the increasing interactive complexity and tight coupling of roofs and other building systems in modern green buildings. Part 1 also provided an overview of the various project life-cycle phases and compared the top green rating system's scope to address or not address moisture durability in those phases.

Introduction

This Part 2 blog reviews the key strengths of the same four green building rating systems in more detail as it relates to moisture durability. The following outlines the key takeaways from this portion of the assessment:

  • To accomplish long-term durability, it's recommended to manage moisture risks when interactive complexity and tight coupling are inherent in a roof and enclosure system design (see Part 1 for more on this).
  • It is recommended to use or borrow the best features from each green building rating system to shore up any project's moisture management specifications, regardless of the actual green building certification being sought.
  • This assessment demonstrates that none of the four green building rating systems, even when combined, currently address moisture durability across all of the project life-cycle phases.
  • The building enclosure commissioning process, in addition to the green building rating systems, can help design the enclosure so that it performs across the project phases for the long-term building performance.

Key Strengths

As a reminder, the four green building rating systems being addressed are:

Below are the notable key strengths of the four green rating systems, described across the project phases - material selection, design & procurement, construction activities, performance testing, operation & maintenance, and enclosure commissioning.

Material Selection Phase

Design & Procurement Phase

Construction Activity Phase

Performance Testing Phase

Operation & Maintenance Phase

Building Enclosure Commissioning

Conclusion

Noticeably absent from most of the categories above, the LBC™ v4.0 doesn't provide specific or prescriptive moisture mitigation requirements for many elements discussed.

To accomplish long-term durability with respect to moisture, it's recommended to manage risk when interactive complexity and tight coupling are inherent in a roof and enclosure system design. It is recommended to use or borrow the best features from each system to shore up any project's specifications. And if the owner is seeking a specific green rating system certification, be sure to look across the alternative rating systems to fill in the gaps where one may leave out elements or is vague regarding enclosure moisture durability. At the same time, be mindful that even when combined, none of the four green building rating systems currently address moisture durability across ALL of the project life-cycle phases. This is why utilizing the building enclosure commissioning process to more formally address the relevant moisture durability risks are being assessed by an enclosure professional can be an important step for green buildings. Designing the enclosure, including the roof system, to perform across the project phases can help manage risk for the long-term building performance.

For more information on designing for moisture durability considerations with green building certifications and individual credit assessments, register for the Continuing Education Center webinar, Addressing Moisture Durability and Energy Performance in Roof Assemblies: A Critical Review of Multiple Voluntary Green Building Certifications, sponsored by GAF and presented by Benjamin Meyer, AIA, LEED AP and James R. Kirby, AIA.


*Note: LEED® is a registered trademark of the U.S. Green Building Council; Green Globes® is a registered trademark of Green Building Initiative, Inc.; LBC™ is a registered trademark of International Living Future Institute; IgCC® is a registered trademark of International Code Council, Inc.

About the Author

Benjamin Meyer, AIA, LEED AP is a Roofing & Building Science Architect with GAF. Previous experience includes: enclosure consultant principal, technical management for enclosure products, commercial design, real estate development and construction management on a range of projects that included residential, educational, offices, and DuPont industrial projects. Industry positions include: Voting Member of the ASHRAE 90.1 Envelope and Project Committees, LEED Technical Committee member, past Technical Advisor of the LEED Materials (MR) TAG, and Director of the Air Barrier Association of America (ABAA).

Related Articles

Three contractors inspecting a GAF cool roof installation
Building Science

Cool Roof Performance: 6 Truths About Cool Roofs

Cool roofs can help save you money on energy bills* in the North as well as the South. Apart from energy savings and lower monthly bills, your building might qualify for certain financial incentives from local and federal governments. Plus, you'll do your part to ensure that your building is more environmentally friendly due to your cool roof performance.

By Authors Mark Soto

March 19, 2025

An architect inspects the roof of a commercial building
Building Science

Wind Design for Roofing Systems: Tips and Tools for Success

As the architect on a project that involves a roof, whether a new construction or a reroof, the building owner relies on you to specify the roofing system that will perform well, stay within their budget, and comply with local building codes. As part of this process, wind design is integral to success. The challenge is choosing the right path to code compliance.

By Authors Karen L Edwards

January 17, 2025

Don't miss another GAF RoofViews post!

Subscribe now